[dns-operations] Input from dns-operations on NCAP proposal
Vladimír Čunát
vladimir.cunat+ietf at nic.cz
Tue May 24 15:54:43 UTC 2022
On 23/05/2022 15.48, Thomas, Matthew via dns-operations wrote:
>
> Configuration 1: Generate a synthetic NXDOMAIN response to all queries
> with no SOA provided in the authority section.
>
I believe the protocol says not to cache such answers at all. Some
implementations chose to cache at least a few seconds, but I don't think
all of them. Breaking caching seems risky to me, as traffic could
increase very much (if the TLD was queried a lot).
> Configuration 2: Generate a synthetic NXDOMAIN response to all queries
> with a SOA record. Some example queries for the TLD .foo are below:
>
It still feels a bit risky to answer in this non-conforming way, and I
can't really see why attempt that. At apex the NXDOMAIN would deny the
SOA included in the very same answer...
> Configuration 3: Use a properly configured empty zone with correct NS
> and SOA records. Queries for the single label TLD would return a
> NOERROR and NODATA response.
>
I expect that's OK, especially if it's a TLD that's seriously
considered. I'd hope that "bad" usage is mainly sensitive to existence
of records of other types like A.
--Vladimir | knot-resolver.cz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20220524/b455964e/attachment.html>
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list