[dns-operations] [Ext] Signing on the fly and UltraDNS

John Levine johnl at taugh.com
Wed Jan 6 18:41:08 UTC 2021

In article <20210106032410.GA6390 at isc.org> you write:
>I wonder aloud if dig's default behavior should be to try IDN and
>silently fall back to conventional output formatting if it fails.
>I imagine there are situations where you'd want the rules strictly
>enforced, but I'm not sure if there was a good reason to do that by

Given that there is no reason to assume that any particular query or
result in dig will be a hostname as opposed to a generic DNS name,
that sounds right to me.


More information about the dns-operations mailing list