[dns-operations] [Ext] Possibly-incorrect NSEC responses from many RSOs

Vladimír Čunát vladimir.cunat+ietf at nic.cz
Sun Feb 28 19:52:38 UTC 2021

On 2/28/21 8:47 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> [1]https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8482#section-7  [tools.ietf.org]
> That RFC (a) doesn't update RFC 4025 and (b) is only about QTYPE of "ANY".

I meant just the informal future-work note focused on QTYPE=RRSIG (in 
the linked section), to support my claim that there are advantages in 
avoiding full replies to such queries.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20210228/ddf121dd/attachment.html>

More information about the dns-operations mailing list