[dns-operations] Google DNS Oddity
vladimir.cunat+ietf at nic.cz
Sun Sep 8 15:39:03 UTC 2019
On 9/6/19 10:40 PM, Chip Marshall via dns-operations wrote:
> It's my understanding that
> without a CNAME record in the answer, the resolver is doing the right thing by
> ignoring the answer, as there's no linkage between www and www-anycast.
Yes, I'm quite sure about that. (as a Knot Resolver developer)
I think some people from 126.96.36.199 are reading this list, so they should
know about it soon enough.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dns-operations