[dns-operations] glitch on [ip6|in-addr].arpa?
paul at redbarn.org
Wed Oct 16 14:19:10 UTC 2019
a late followup.
Rubens Kuhl wrote on 2019-10-12 13:50:
> If someone from Cogent is reading, that's their opportunity to step
> up and provide at least a partial feed to OARC.
i'm part of the cogent c-root team, and i was a co-founder of dns-oarc.
we have hosted elements of the dns-oarc project at cogent before, and we
are working with the dns-oarc engineering team to make our
ipv6-addressed c-root server visible to their measurement systems.
> Unless they want to do the better thing which is to end this peering
> war and stop messing IPv6 Internet...
when i succeeded dave rand as cto of abovenet in Y2K or so, we had a
completely open peering policy -- we even peered with customers, if they
wanted a second BGP connection so they didn't have to pay by bit-volume
when exchange traffic with our other customers. this made business sense
to the company and its employees and investors and customers.
hurricane and cogent are also businesses, each having employees and
investors and customers. they are each doing what makes sense to them.
this is not a "peering war" by any stretch of the vocabulary. cogent
does not have a completely open peering policy, and while hurricane has
transit for its ipv4 network, it lacks transit for its ipv6 network.
their networks, their rules.
More information about the dns-operations