[dns-operations] NS1 nameservers response size

Jan Včelák jv at fcelda.cz
Fri May 24 11:10:23 UTC 2019


Hello,

I can confirm we do not respect the buffer size. We are aware of this
deficiency but it also doesn't have high priority at the moment.

Have you encountered a situation where it has been causing trouble for a
real application? Or is this an accidental discovery?

Jan (NS1)

Dne pá 24. 5. 2019 12:19 uživatel Manabu Sonoda <manabu-s at iij.ad.jp> napsal:

> Are NS1not implement edns0 buffer size ?
> Do they plan to implement it ?
>
> ( Close eyes bad rdata....)
>
> dig @dns2.p07.nsone.net globalsign.com txt +bufsize=512
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.23.rc1.el6_5.1 <<>> @dns2.p07.nsone.net
> globalsign.com txt +bufsize=512
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 11262
> ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 12, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
> ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
>
> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;globalsign.com.                        IN      TXT
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT     "MS=ms71622826"
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT
>  "aoLxrQBK4FSoQsQVxk8Oh0QqDIiILef/m6EwZTmpg1M="
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT
>  "cH2cwv2lMzoxbrhQDsfB7LDv/Jsu2TDDZSQznoA/H1rtSih8CLKju0RZrRDahPyMLM4ZYA8sGijs561ll2AZPw=="
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT
>  "eBPD7w6DE9vYNPwczqepRahUkUAkBw5qxW7qsAOd+ig="
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT
>  "google-site-verification=gtfgX6oja-rl-TcVUtRidcodGC-4xwiVrFdhz2Njuo0"
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT
>  "pardot_341121_*=1f62b656fc75f01e2dbf46962f3df567f9435270c2ac313c6587c4bbef258d0f"
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT     "v=DKIM1\;k=rsa\;
> p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC1vhugV30ayqwRy2mu+m6QyxvdVtHee/ChrUqtrPflazjf3LfuGryocUGTZ66DsHZeTpjqdcRRXms1+xpVsqqeiXipw4jNPwx9VpyIyg0suI/2QYsIjKyj0OFYWe22Ilgp/zjXXJUxJ4fTqT5ae0cAX5u3GNsj6dA8u9n3atIlIwIDAQAB"
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT
>  "v=DKIM1\;k=rsa\;p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQCzTQa7JyCBCGKvGz3/6F2vf5dXWZKOD4y56gizEWfUITZ/OvV4VYxCUAAD6JicyyPg+SjweyBcRNBVb+oaZ4NiCvCu2Pci5UIOZZwZn45XRFTpLnj/bTJE5elcmXvf2LytUQlGcM4N9qjzGlb4qdohLghBvRaQ+YpXK+Nrg6UokQIDAQAB"
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT
>  "v=DKIM1\;k=rsa\;p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDL/t1pilYMRJcrBcyXuRdNmdpN1fnF0cC6eI34BAw7w8YW1cwH14MjbhtX6QrWhrpGFGDZOzEv3BSA8MXWNMxInJtppacMoSB2ZCRwWe4d0Hk0uklh5g5iydksSAwf+GK8YJEj9UPDJx6/y7zQytjWee9s4n2ABSGpDCMMdJkFBQIDAQAB"
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT
>  "v=DMARC1\;p=reject\;rua=mailto:dmarc at globalsign.com"
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT     "v=spf1 ip4:
> 114.179.250.0/30 ip4:211.123.204.251/32 ip4:27.121.42.215/32 ip4:
> 211.11.149.164/32 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_
> spf.salesforce.com include:spf-bma.mpme.jp include:_spf.act-on.net
> include:es._spf.adp.com -all"
> globalsign.com.         300     IN      TXT
>  "yandex-verification:e54a3279b05955ba"
>
> ;; Query time: 3 msec
> ;; SERVER: 198.51.45.7#53(198.51.45.7)
> ;; WHEN: Fri May 24 18:48:31 2019
> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 1551
>
> --
> Manabu Sonoda <manabu-s at iij.ad.jp>
> Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-operations
> <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operationsdns-operations>
> mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20190524/4a5a859c/attachment.html>


More information about the dns-operations mailing list