[dns-operations] Current status of DNSViz's historical data

Warren Kumari warren at kumari.net
Mon Jul 1 21:28:28 UTC 2019

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 5:24 PM Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane at dukhovni.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:23:28AM -0400, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> > And that brings to a close this very long explanation for the continued
> > lack of historical data in the DNSViz interface.  If you made it this far,
> > thanks for reading.  Also, if you made it this far, I am quite jealous of
> > your free time.
> Thanks, much appreciated, and good luck!  My optimism is reborn.

Indeed -- it's amazing how easy it is to fall into the "Bah, this
should be trivial - it takes less than a minute to type `scp
oldmachine:/src newmachine:/dest`, what's taking them so long?!"
mindset, without considering that the problem is likely much more

I'm sure we've all experienced the sort of "comedy of errors" type
problem like Matt is describing, and have had to deal with the
festering horror that is IP KVM and what a huge and frustrating
time-sink it can be.

Thanks for providing the detail, and I take back all of the snarky
thoughts I thought about y'all :-)


> --
>         Viktor.
> [ No need for jealousy, no free time to see heere, move along. ]
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-operations mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations

I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.

More information about the dns-operations mailing list