[dns-operations] Mailing List Behaviour Change

John Levine johnl at taugh.com
Sat Apr 6 19:07:30 UTC 2019

In article <1554071561.15150.1.camel at domainmail.org> you write:
>Might I suggest that you also wrap messages with a p=none policy.  Per the
>spec, p=none is for testing, but  that doesn't mean "do nothing".  Wrap the
>p=none messages so that those senders too will see how DMARC impacts them.

I think you're confusing p=none with pct=0.  The former most
definitely means to do nothing.


More information about the dns-operations mailing list