[dns-operations] EdDSA status ?
Lanlan Pan
abbypan at gmail.com
Mon Jun 4 01:05:57 UTC 2018
Frederico A C Neves <fneves at registro.br>于2018年6月2日周六 上午2:05写道:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 06:30:21PM +0200, Peter Koch wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 09:06:58AM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >
> > > Just so I can understand: why is anyone even interested in using EdDSA
> > > instead of ECDSA in DNSSEC unless you are doing online (live) signing?
> >
> > all other parameters equal, EdDSA produces consistent signatures.
>
> EdDSA has another advantage... the public key representation is only
> 32 or 57 octets long. Any of them are shorter than P256, bringing even
> better options for standby keys.
>
Since ECDSA with nounce and longer public key, is stronger than EdDSA ?
> Fred
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-operations mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>
--
致礼 Best Regards
潘蓝兰 Pan Lanlan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20180603/87a2ef36/attachment.html>
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list