[dns-operations] new public DNS service: 9.9.9.9

[Yonghua Peng]

Totally agree.
quad9's peering seems so worse  from here. But google is far better.

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Witold Krecicki <wpk at isc.org> wrote:

> On 21.11.2017 23:48, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
> > On 11/16/17 22:26, Ken Peng wrote:
> >> https://gizmodo.com/new-dns-service-launched-by-ibm-vows-
> to-keep-your-brows-1820508262
> >>
> >
> >
> > One thing I'm loving about 9.9.9.9 is because PCH is so widely
> > deployed and peered, using 9.9.9.9 comes from a local node in my city.
> > The nearest location 8.8.8.8 is served from isn't even in my state.
> It's all about your ISP - I have both at the same distance (in the same
> building, to be exact), but I know people who have <5ms to quad8, >50ms
> to quad9. So PCH is not wider than google - it simply has different
> peers, better for some, worse for some.
>
> --
> wpk
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-operations mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20171122/4728ef0b/attachment.html>