[dns-operations] [Ext] Re: Denying Whois DB by GeoIP
Paul Vixie
paul at redbarn.org
Mon Jun 12 07:01:48 UTC 2017
On Monday, June 12, 2017 5:36:42 AM GMT Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/11/2017 03:36 PM, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> >> You might also consider the decades of research that has
> >> gone into demonstrating that spammers don't bother
> >> harvesting e-mail address from whois data.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/sac-023-2012-02-25-en
> >
> > Maybe things have changed since 2007. But I doubt it.
>
> You don't think things have changed in 10 years? On the Internet?
gentlemen, none of this matters. accurate whois including reachable e-mail
addresses is a duty of care that every registrant owes to the eco-system they
are benefiting from. it doesn't matter if you'll get a lot of spam, or a
little. what matters is that you read it all, and process your complaints. i
say "your complaints" because they are yours and they are complaints -- uses
of your internet identifiers that give more benefit to communication senders
than to receivers.
in other words the spam you enable outweighs the spam you receive. if you
don't like the spam you receive, report it, carefully and every single time,
to abusix and/or spamhaus and/or the other teams who can work it back to their
senders and enablers. but meanwhile, be ready to receive complaints and
reports of enablement or transmission by you via your internet identifiers.
the entire argument about whether accurate whois leads to more spam is
misplaced.
vixie
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list