[dns-operations] Emoji "Female" symbol fails to resolve at Google's 8.8.8.8 & 8.8.4.4

Phillip Hallam-Baker phill at hallambaker.com
Thu Jul 13 15:50:39 UTC 2017


Sometimes, when dealing with journalists, they get the wrong impression
despite what you said.

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:

>
>
> On 13 Jul 2017, at 16:11, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> > (It's also kinda strange
> > that Patrik says that SSAC "discovered" that IDNA doesn't permit
> > these, since he's actually the author of the document that says that.
> > I'm sure it was a matter of presentation, but it sounds a little
> > strange if you know the history.)
>
> I probably used crappy English.
>
> In Swedish one say "discover" also when a. one get a question on whether
> emoji is ok, and b. find that the IDNA standard is not allowing emoji.
>
> I.e. even if one just do a check in the Unicode tables for a code point
> and see it is not PVALID, it is still "discovered" that it is not PVALID.
>
> Regardless of how little "research" it was.
>
> Key point is, as you write Andrew, that it is definitely not ICANN that
> have made the decision. ICANN refer to IDNA2008.
>
>    Patrik
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-operations mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20170713/6db3c07f/attachment.html>


More information about the dns-operations mailing list