[dns-operations] Emoji "Female" symbol fails to resolve at Google's 8.8.8.8 & 8.8.4.4

Warren Kumari warren at kumari.net
Tue Jul 11 13:54:33 UTC 2017


Because the DNSSEC for that domain is broken....
http://dnsviz.net/d/xn--e5h.com/dnssec/

The other resolvers that you tried presumably do not validate....

Working as intended, will not fix :-),
W

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:41 AM, James Stevens <James.Stevens at jrcs.co.uk> wrote:
> Although the "Female" symbol (U+2640 ♀) is not IDNA2008 compliant, it had
> been sold as a dot-COM some time ago - along with a few other "emoji"
> dot-COM domains.
>
> It used to work fine at Google's resolver service, and works fine at other
> resolvers I tried, but Google now immediately returns "status: SERVFAIL"
>
> Anybody know why Google now returns "status: SERVFAIL" for ♀.com
> (xn--e5h.com), but still works fine for ☮.com (xn--v4h.com)
>
>
> The NS for xn--e5h.com are ...
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> xn--e5h.com.            172800  IN      NS      ns75.domaincontrol.com.
> xn--e5h.com.            172800  IN      NS      ns76.domaincontrol.com.
>
> and they are still working fine.
>
>
>
>
> James
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-operations mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf




More information about the dns-operations mailing list