[dns-operations] Change to BIND minimal-responses config option

Mukund Sivaraman muks at isc.org
Sat Apr 22 02:35:13 UTC 2017

Hi Duane

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 08:44:52PM +0000, Wessels, Duane wrote:
> Hi Mukund,
> Thanks for the heads-up.  
> I wonder how well we understand the consequences that
> minimal-responses has on cached NS records?  If my authoritative
> servers for a second-level domain like example.com uses
> minimal-responses, then will a recursive cache ever receive the NS
> RRset from the authoritative servers?  Or will it only have the RRset
> from the parent (com), which might also have different TTLs?

It will not receive them unless it queries for them.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20170422/bf33289e/attachment.sig>

More information about the dns-operations mailing list