[dns-operations] DNS filtering in the UK

[Paul Vixie]

Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:07:44PM -0700, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>>> Why do applications need to care about the purported motivation of
>>> the interference.  When destination is made unreachable, the technical
>>> details are hardly relevant.
>>>
>>> I don't see how this derails DNSSEC.  What DNSSEC does is make the
>>> interferecent visible, is there anything wrong with that?
>> http://www.redbarn.org/node/6
>
> I take no issue with the spirit of the document, but it seems that
> those DNS filters that the vast majority of users will neither
> notice nor be motivated to circumvent will do little harm to DNSSEC.

the document covers that point.

and your other points.

if you don't agree, please argue in more detail against specific 
statements made in that document.

or, ask questions.

-- 
P Vixie