[dns-operations] EDNS and TLDs
matt at conundrum.com
Thu Nov 17 03:50:10 UTC 2016
On 17 November 2016 at 12:28, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
> In message <CAAiTEH9UCNw5hdWAW7brmT1eVL20+WqH25m2NWf3RzV5i4Nv4Q at mail.
> , Matthew Pounsett writes:
> > On 17 November 2016 at 11:49, Matthew Pounsett <matt at conundrum.com>
> > >
> > > I've always been a little annoyed that no "do not send updates" signal
> > > was never considered when the UPDATE mechanism was codified.
> > >
> > > "... was ever considered..."
> Well Apple registered a SRV record for UPDATE so that UPDATEs don't
> need to go to the NS's. In theory if the update client supports
> the SRV record (there is a ticket to add this feature to nsupdate)
> then there is a way to signal this.
> dns-update is the registered string.
Do you know how the patch is to be implemented? If absence of the relevant
SRV record indicates fallback to MNAME then it doesn't solve the problem.
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dns-operations