[dns-operations] TC=1 with RA=0 from a recursive resolver
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Tue Mar 22 10:11:02 UTC 2016
* Mark Andrews:
> In message <87io0f6i78.fsf at mid.deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer writes:
>> * Mark Andrews:
>> > That's what RFC 1034 says.
>> > - The recursion available, or RA bit, is set or cleared by a
>> > name server in all responses. The bit is true if the name
>> > server is willing to provide recursive service for the client,
>> > regardless of whether the client requested recursive service.
>> > That is, RA signals availability rather than use.
>> > If RD effects RA then the server is broken.
>> But RFC 1034 does not reflect current practice.
> Nothing has changed this behaviour since RFC 1034 was written.
What I'm trying to say is that some (many?) currently deployed
recursors do not send RA=1 responses to RD=0 queries even if they
would have performed recursion for the same query with RD=1.
RFCs from the 1980s are rarely a good reference to determine current
More information about the dns-operations