[dns-operations] The strange case of fox.com

[Mark Andrews]

In message <56D47005.20206 at redbarn.org>, Paul Vixie writes:
> it's never been practical for a registry to check the NS RR's of its 
> delegated child apexes. i think that both registrars and registrants 
> should do so, and would do so if there were better tooling available.

For each NS registered in whois / parent zone
	dig NS +norec zone +short @NS | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]' | sort
	if (NS set does not match)
		flag for followup where followup involved re-testing
			after X hours then sending email to contacts
			for zone.

This is not rocket science.  The tools have existed to do this for
decades now. 

As for whether the Registry / Registrar performs the actual looks
I don't care.  The Registry is clearly responsible for ensuring
that they get performed as they are responsible for the overall
operations of the parent zone.

Mark

> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-jobs mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org