[dns-operations] DNS activities in Japan

[Jared Mauch]

> On Jul 6, 2016, at 2:10 AM, Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:
> 
> Mark Andrews wrote:
> ...
>> Basically it is a non-issue.  It's like disk quotas.  Usually more
>> pain than they are worth.
> 
> while i agree, i also think that a receiver should fail robustly in this scenario.

Yes, I think setting a zone size limit of 1G should be ‘reasonable’ for example.

USER       PID %CPU %MEM    VSZ   RSS TTY      STAT START   TIME COMMAND
named     8120 53.4 53.7 8316872 4391908 ?     Ssl  Jul01 3945:55 valgrind -q --gen-suppressions=all --num-callers=48 —ful

puck:~$ rndc status
version: BIND 9.11.0b1-RedHat-9.11.0-0.b1.fc24 <id:dca6957>
running on puck.nether.net: Linux x86_64 4.5.5-300.fc24.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 19 13:05:32 UTC 2016
boot time: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:47:08 GMT
last configured: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 21:30:13 GMT
configuration file: /etc/named.conf
CPUs found: 2
worker threads: 2
UDP listeners per interface: 1
number of zones: 9640 (98 automatic)
debug level: 0
xfers running: 0
xfers deferred: 0
soa queries in progress: 6
query logging is OFF
recursive clients: 0/3996/4096
tcp clients: 0/1500
server is up and running