[dns-operations] Is DNSSEC causing more problems than it solves.

Matthew Pounsett matt at conundrum.com
Tue Feb 23 19:36:59 UTC 2016

> On Feb 23, 2016, at 09:23, Doug Barton <dougb at dougbarton.email> wrote:
> On 02/23/2016 08:35 AM, David C Lawrence wrote:
>> Brett writes:
>>> I was very glad to see that Kieran had at least included a link to the
>>> ISC Article penned by Andrei which is I felt, a very good response to
>>> the Akamai paper.
>> For the record, please do note that the Akamai paper (with which I was
>> not involved, incidentally) does not make value judgments about the
>> desirability of DNSSEC in the whole.
> "This thing is horrible! And bad! And DANGEROUS!!!!" But we're not making value judgements about it? Seriously?

Are you talking about the Akamai paper, or the Register article?  I think that is an accurate assessment of the Register article, but I didn't get that from the Akamai paper.

> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-jobs mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

More information about the dns-operations mailing list