[dns-operations] Percentage of new domains that are "bad"?

[Hugo Salgado-Hernández]

I only know this study on new gTLDs presented in IMC2015:
"From .academy to .zone: An Analysis of the New TLD Land Rush"
<http://conferences2.sigcomm.org/imc/2015/papers/p381.pdf>

Hugo

On 10:19 15/02, Allan Liska wrote:
> I thought I read somewhere that 85% of newly registered domains are "bad" (spam, phishing, delivering malware, etc).  I have been searching all morning and can't find that statistic, the closest I have been able to come is the BlueCoat study from last year (http://www.thedomains.com/2015/09/01/bluecoat-study-top-10-shady-sites-in-new-gtlds-is-severely-flawed-as-unlaunched-zip-is-1/).  Is anyone familiar with the statistic and where it originated or did I imagine the whole thing?
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> allan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-jobs mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20160215/24b9dda5/attachment.sig>