[dns-operations] negative caching weirdness

[Matthew Pounsett]

On 22 April 2016 at 15:01, Daniel Stirnimann <daniel.stirnimann at switch.ch>
wrote:

> >     Now, the only strange result left is if I look up the name using my
> >     local resolver which returns 10800.
> >
> > Your local recursive server will give you the cache TTL, which is the
> > amount of time remaining on the TTL, not the TTLs original value.
>
> I don't think this is the case. I get the same result if I flush the cache.
>

Is it possible your recursive server implements a max TTL configuration
value that is set to 10800?

I'm curious what recursive server you're using, if the TTL it reports
doesn't decrement as time passes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20160422/f2e31cd8/attachment.html>