[dns-operations] Cname errors?
Tony Finch
dot at dotat.at
Tue Sep 29 16:05:25 UTC 2015
Brett Frankenberger <rbf+dns-operations at panix.com> wrote:
>
> For clarity, the new behavior (or new default, as the case may be) with
> the upgrade is the logging, and the regusal to follow is not new?
Correct. The CHNAGES file has the following entry; the code around the new
logging is very old.
4015. [bug] Nameservers that are skipped due to them being
CNAMEs were not being logged. They are now logged
to category 'cname' as per BIND 8. [RT #37935]
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Viking, North Utsire: Easterly 4 or 5, increasing 6 at times. Slight or
moderate, but rough in southwest Viking. Showers later. Good, occasionally
poor later.
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list