[dns-operations] Cname errors?

Tony Finch dot at dotat.at
Tue Sep 29 16:05:25 UTC 2015


Brett Frankenberger <rbf+dns-operations at panix.com> wrote:
>
> For clarity, the new behavior (or new default, as the case may be) with
> the upgrade is the logging, and the regusal to follow is not new?

Correct. The CHNAGES file has the following entry; the code around the new
logging is very old.

4015.   [bug]           Nameservers that are skipped due to them being
                        CNAMEs were not being logged. They are now logged
                        to category 'cname' as per BIND 8. [RT #37935]

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Viking, North Utsire: Easterly 4 or 5, increasing 6 at times. Slight or
moderate, but rough in southwest Viking. Showers later. Good, occasionally
poor later.



More information about the dns-operations mailing list