[dns-operations] im. TLD

Mitchell Kuch mitch at basejp.com
Thu Sep 10 18:37:22 UTC 2015


Shane -

I appreciate everyones effort in supporting IPv6 DNS. Continued
communication is key and we have seen great strides with
implementations - in part because of this forum.

I've too have attempted to work with the TLDs to flush out their IPv6
implementations. It is a bit strange the oddities that one can stumble
across.

Take the im. TLD as an example.

im. 172800  IN      NS      ns4.ja.net.
im. 172800  IN      NS      hoppy.iom.com.
im. 172800  IN      NS      barney.advsys.co.uk.
im. 172800  IN      NS      pebbles.iom.com.

Only ns4.ja.net. has a AAAA record.

ns4.ja.net. 86400   IN      A       193.62.157.66
ns4.ja.net. 86400   IN      AAAA    2001:630:0:47::42

and only ns4.ja.net.provides AAAA glue records for im. domains

$ dig +additional @ns4.ja.net. ns1.im.

; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> +additional @ns4.ja.net. ns1.im.
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd

;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 42217
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 5
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ns1.im.                                IN      A


;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ns1.im. 259200  IN      NS      ns1.im.
ns1.im. 259200  IN      NS      ns0.im.
ns1.im. 259200  IN      NS      ns2.im.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.im. 43200   IN      A       85.159.233.58
ns1.im. 43200   IN      AAAA    2604:9a00:2100:a000:3::6
ns0.im. 43200   IN      A       50.7.96.170
ns2.im. 43200   IN      A       108.59.1.205
ns2.im. 43200   IN      AAAA    2604:9a00:2100:a001:2::1

;; Query time: 179 msec
;; SERVER: 193.62.157.66#53(193.62.157.66)
;; WHEN: Thu Sep 10 14:13:24 2015
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 178


$ dig +additional @hoppy.iom.com. ns1.im.

; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> +additional @hoppy.iom.com. ns1.im.
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 8399
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 3
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ns1.im.                                IN      A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ns1.im. 259200  IN      NS      ns0.im.
ns1.im. 259200  IN      NS      ns2.im.
ns1.im. 259200  IN      NS      ns1.im.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns0.im 43200   IN      A       50.7.96.170
ns2.im. 43200   IN      A       108.59.1.205
ns1.im. 43200   IN      A       85.159.233.58

;; Query time: 148 msec
;; SERVER: 217.23.163.140#53(217.23.163.140)
;; WHEN: Thu Sep 10 14:13:43 2015
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 122


While ns4.ja.net. servers IPv6 records for the im. zone and delegates
(via both IPv4 and IPv6) the other TLD names servers do not.

 - - Mitchell

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shane Kerr" <shane at time-travellers.org>
To: "Jim Reid" <jim at rfc1035.com>
Cc: dns-operations at dns-oarc.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 2:04:43 AM
Subject: Re: [dns-operations] Enabling the IPv6-only Internet: the Final TLDs

> My proposal is "try to do something to help". You idea is that this is wrong, and therefore we should... not?



More information about the dns-operations mailing list