[dns-operations] The Decline and Fall of BIND 10

[João Damas]

If it is 9.11, it might be good number to make attack resilience the focus of that version (a good code audit, more robust error-condition response, evolution of RRL and related features, logging that doesn't kill you, etc)

Joao

On 15 May 2014, at 01:19, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam at gmail.com> wrote:

> What is the next edition of BIND going to be called then, 10 or 11?
> 
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:25 PM, staticsafe <me at staticsafe.ca> wrote:
>> This might be of interest:
>> 
>> https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/208-The_Decline_and_Fall_of_BIND_10.pdf
>> --
>> staticsafe
>> https://asininetech.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> dns-operations mailing list
>> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
>> dns-jobs mailing list
>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Website: http://hallambaker.com/
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-jobs mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20140515/1aa5551d/attachment.sig>