[dns-operations] knot-dns

Edward Lewis edward.lewis at icann.org
Mon Dec 15 23:25:26 UTC 2014

On 12/15/14, 14:40, someone wrote:

>My point is that the negatives far outweigh the benefits in most

The problem with broad generalizations is that they are always wrong.

(Meant as a joke.)

I skimmed this thread now and then and thought about my experience in
building and operating systems.  Ever since “The Cuckoo’s Egg” - as far as
I know - “genetic code diversity” has been a fad.  It got woven into a lot
of requirements.  Having spent a long time inside operators, I’ve seen
this become more of an albatross than a “good idea."

If I am operating a system supporting external customers, homogeneity is a

If I am operating a system for my own benefit, heterogeneity is a benefit.

My recommendation for a service provider stick with one code base and
learn to run it well.  My recommendation for a customer of such a provider
use two or more service providers.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4604 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20141215/aeb34061/attachment.bin>

More information about the dns-operations mailing list