[dns-operations] Google DNS used as amplification - aren't they caching?
paul at nohats.ca
Wed Aug 6 16:32:49 UTC 2014
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Casey Deccio wrote:
> Why does google dns seems so inefficient at caching?
> Google's implementation seems to recursively query for and cache ANY based on the entire set of records for the same name,
> rather than on a per-record basis. nohats.ca includes an NSEC3PARAM record with TTL 0. This results in zero caching of ANY
Oh, the irony :)
More information about the dns-operations