[dns-operations] Introducing CNAME Flattening: RFC-Compliant CNAMEs at a Domain's Root
Mark Andrews
marka at isc.org
Sat Apr 5 03:26:42 UTC 2014
In message <21310.50033.650900.982948 at tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>, David C Law
rence writes:
> Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> > I was not able to find a real example: all the companies mentioned in
> > the article as being happy users have their Web server at CloudFlare,
> > where this service is useless.
>
> I agree, it is a little peculiar, with their anycast HTTP servers.
> You can see that some of these sites have www names that use a CNAME
> intermediary, and conceivably they have configured their apex to use
> that same CNAME with CloudFlare's flattening feature. They're also
> all giving me the same result from clients in both New England and
> from Tokyo, so it does make it difficult to discern from the outside
> that anything special is going on with an intermediary name.
>
> Mark Andrews writes:
> > Or one can add SRV or some other record that does the name
> > to server mapping and not have to do all this behind the
> > scenes stuff.
>
> Lack of browser support is a big barrier to adoption here, and browser
> vendors don't seem particularly eager to tackle it.
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14328
> is still in state New, and it was opened in 1999.
The big barrier is people saying "there is a big barrier".
FreeBSD is using _http._tcp today for some of their services.
> Me? I love the vision of it, obviating hacks around the apex CNAME
> restriction, but it just isn't practical right now. People
> like the econsultancy.com CTO quoted in the article have a problem
> with wanting to brand their sites without www (as you yourself
> indicated was an issue in your draft back in 2002). Resolving the
> CNAME internally solves their problem and works with existing
> clients.
Which doesn't stop a proper solution being defined which leaves you
ties to a single hoster.
> Bring me a world in which SRV for HTTP without location bar
> redirection is commonplace, and we'd be happy to encourage its use.
>
> Anthony Eden writes:
> > While CloudFlare did not give any credit to previous work done
> > (which sort of pisses me off, but whatever), they are essentially
> > implementing the same thing that Amazon did with their ALIAS
> > implementation, the same thing that we did with the DNSimple ALIAS
> > implementation, and the same thing that DNSMadeEasy did with ANAME
> > records.
>
> FWIW Akamai has been doing it since 2003, but I don't feel
> particularly put off that they didn't itemize how their competitors
> do similar things.
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-jobs mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list