[dns-operations] Should medium-sized companies run their own recursive resolver?
Carlos M. Martinez
carlosm3011 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 14 17:48:40 UTC 2013
The problem that i see is that if you don't run your local DNS, then if
your link with the outside world goes down, you're essentially toasted
even for your own, locally hosted, services.
This may not be a concern if you live in the more developed parts of the
world, but down south here, trust me, it is.
Granted, you can teach your users to access your printers and local file
servers by IP, but that hardly seems a sane approach in the long run.
Here in the true 'deep south', people run 30-40 people SOHOs behind
dynamic-IP ADSL lines, which change addresses every 12 hours. Some of
them even do clever tricks to load-balance cheap DSL lines.
So, yes, I think running your own DNS is something important to do, not
only for recursion but for resolving local resources as well.
On 10/14/13 3:41 PM, Richard Lamb wrote:
> If google concerns are irrelevant I'd say just use 220.127.116.11 (like many corps already do). Safety in numbers, deep pockets and lawyers ;-)
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 9:09, "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
>> A fictitious 100-person company has an IT staff of 2 who have average IT talents. They run some local servers, and they have adequate connectivity for the company's offices through an average large ISP.
>> Should that company run its own recursive resolver for its employees, or should it continue to rely on its ISP?
>> --Paul Hoffman
>> dns-operations mailing list
>> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
>> dns-jobs mailing list
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> dns-jobs mailing list
More information about the dns-operations