[dns-operations] bind + client-subnet

[Paul Vixie]

Evan Hunt wrote:
>> but how to implement that? since local DNS server always has caching.
>
> Yes, this is why I said it would be a big job to implement it in BIND.  It
> becomes necessary to cache multiple different answers to the same question.

that's why it's controversial. it's effectively an expansion of the Q-Tuple.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20130813/0180cc83/attachment.html>