[dns-operations] First experiments with DNS dampening to fight amplification attacks
    Dobbins, Roland 
    rdobbins at arbor.net
       
    Fri Oct 26 12:31:43 UTC 2012
    
    
  
On Oct 26, 2012, at 7:24 PM, <WBrown at e1b.org> wrote:
> If so, why can't they block anything outside that range.
This is the perpetual refrain questioning why BCP84 hasn't been universally implemented.  Lack of clue, lack of perceived economic incentive, lack of infrastructure capability (though the natural cycle of equipment upgrades has largely eliminated this issue on networks running even semi-modern gear), apathy, sloth, venality.
In the main, it isn't a question of 'can't' - it's a question of 'won't'.  Which is why Paul was saying that network infrastructure vendors should by default enable various anti-spoofing mechanisms on the gear they well.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
	  Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
		       -- John Milton
    
    
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list