[dns-operations] thoughts on DNSSEC
Warren Kumari
warren at kumari.net
Wed Jul 25 15:22:27 UTC 2012
On Jul 25, 2012, at 3:36 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
>> What about always using both types of DS record? Why does everyone
>> publish both SHA-1 and SHA-256 digests? RFC 4509 is more than 6
>> years old.
>
> => in fact perhaps it is the right time to jump to SHA-256 only?
Somewhat related: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-crocker-dnssec-algo-signal-07
Wouldn't it be nice to know who supports what, so these questions are easier to answer in the future?!
W
>
> Regards
>
> Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr
> _______________________________________________
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-jobs mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
>
--
American Non-Sequitur Society;
we don't make sense, but we do like pizza!
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list