[dns-operations] Experience with DDNS (RFC 2136)
Simon Munton
Simon.Munton at communitydns.net
Fri Oct 7 15:08:21 UTC 2011
In the case of a master server updating slaves, its much more common to
use NOTIFY+IXFR. I would have thought that D/DNS would have niche uses,
for example where there are multiple sources of updates to a zone (e.g.
PCs reporting their LAN IP Address) or where you only want to update
individual records (e.g. DynDNS scenario - very similar to the LAN example).
But for updating slaves, I would have thought D/DNS has no advantage
over NOTIFY+IXFR, but N+I has the advantage of being more tolerant of
interruptions to the connectivity and has the ability to fall back to
AXFR for recovery scenarios.
That said, I would imagine that for sending updates from the registry
database to the master in the first place D/DNS would probably be used.
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list