[dns-operations] Who Ignores TTLs ?
david.haygood at pgnmail.com
Thu Feb 17 14:35:45 UTC 2011
I know our ISP was extending TTLs of records set with short TTLs. This ruined an email spam software we were using because the TTL was modified so it didn't match the expected value, the software would mark it a spam.
From: dns-operations-bounces at lists.dns-oarc.net [mailto:dns-operations-bounces at lists.dns-oarc.net] On Behalf Of Simon Lyall
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 9:01 PM
To: dns-operations at mail.dns-oarc.net
Subject: [dns-operations] Who Ignores TTLs ?
I keep seeing a persistent complaint that some DNS caching operators
ignore TTLs or otherwise keep records for longer than the TTL would
I suspect this might be an urban legend since most DNS caching software
doesn't even offer this as an option last time I checked.
Does anybody actually do this? Because it keep being brought up by some
peopel as to why things like GSLB don't work.
Simon Lyall | Very Busy | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/
"To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT.
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
More information about the dns-operations