[dns-operations] New U.S. Senate Bill re DNS Blocking
netfortius at gmail.com
Thu Sep 23 19:17:12 UTC 2010
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Tony Finch <dot at dotat.at> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Rick Jones wrote:
> > I'll take a guess - 'If we have decided that the folks using a domain
> name are
> > being "naughty" (per our definition of naughty) then anyone operating a
> > server must implement a means by which folks trying to resolve that name
> to an
> > IP address won't be able to do so.'
> Not "anyone": only those operators served with a court order need block
> the domain.
> f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
> HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO
> DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR
> ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD.
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations at lists.dns-oarc.net
Somehow I am tempted to see this as one of the many steps [having?!?] to be
taken, to achieve what in layman's terms has been recently described here:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dns-operations