[dns-operations] The possible problems after May 5th

[Matthew Dempsky]

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:34 PM, John Payne <john at sackheads.org> wrote:
> Several of those are out of balliwick CNAMEs.  Do you include those failing as failures, or is it success if you received a CNAME?

Yes, if www.foo.com was resolved as a CNAME pointing to
foo.cdncorp.com, and foo.cdncorp.com failed to resolve using TCP, then
I counted that as www.foo.com failing to resolve.