[dns-operations] Problems resolving .gov using DLV

[Paul Vixie]

At 12:18 +0100 3/17/09, Florian Weimer wrote:
> And 5.2 trumps 5.5?  I wouldn't count on that.  RFC 4033 lists the

Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:34:10 -0400
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz>
> The intent has always been that if a user cannot understand the algorithm,
> the user ignores the algorithm's presence.  If, for all algorithms in the
> DS set none are understood, the zone is unsigned (in the eye of the user).

in that case this isn't a DLV spec oversight, but rather a parallel bug in
the two independent DLV implementations (BIND and UnBound).