[dns-operations] When TLDs have apex A records
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Jul 6 02:42:52 UTC 2009
>> i think we have a good demonstration that no new gtlds are actually
>> needed.
> Others would appear to have a different opinion.
they just have religion?
who bears costs:
o root operators have more data to sign, serve, ...
o trademark holders now have more places to pay
o users have less cachability
who benefits:
o icann gets more money
o some domainers get more money
oh goodie.
>> i really appreciate technical analysis and advice from anyone, even
>> icann. i do not appreciate edicts from marinara del roi.
> As I pointed out, ICANN's actions were actually based on technical
> input (including input from folks on this list).
i appreciate the technical input. i do not appreciate the edicts from
on high.
> If new gTLDs are going to occur and assuming ICANN does not have a
> mechanism to winnow the "lawyers, slime, sharks, and sheep" from the
> good guys, it would seem to me that based on that technical input,
> disallowing wildcards would be appropriate.
drc, imiho, icann are the "lawyers, slime, sharks, and sheep!" we all
just get to pay for it.
randy
More information about the dns-operations
mailing list