[dns-operations] Unplanned DLV zone outage on 2009-Apr-06
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Wed Apr 15 01:42:46 UTC 2009
In message <slrngua9g4.kmo.lutz at belenus.iks-jena.de>, Lutz Donnerhacke writes:
> * Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > What happens if the unknowing zone decided to become unsigned but the DLV
> > still indicates that it should be signed? (Due to no relationship and
> > communication with the DLV.)
> That's a main problem, if RFC 5011 is not applied by the registrant.
> DLVs are a simple part of this mine field. The various trustman
> implementations out there are the unpredictable part.
RFC 5011 is not needed in a DLV/parent relationship.
RFC 5011 is useful in one-to-unknown.
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org
More information about the dns-operations