[dns-operations] blocking recursers

[Ondřej Surý]

On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 07:50 -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> my issue is in the opposite direction.  without such an rfc, if
> >> i take preemptive action against an orn, the orn operator would
> >> seem to have a legitimate claim to have done nothing wrong.
> > [IANAL] You can put this in your terms of service.  Ie.:
> >   3.2.1 nameserver services will not be provided to ORN.
> > + definition of ORN
> > And then you don't have to have RFC describing same.
> 
> where are these terms of service for us ops who run dns servers?
> 
> the closest we come is the rfcs.  hence my suggestion that the
> rfc path needs to be pursued.

I am not aware of any.  I was simply trying to point out, that there
_could_ be some, which would give at least some legal framework, but
that may wary from TLD to TLD and country to country.

Ondrej.
P.S.: Please don't Cc: me, I am subscribed to list.
-- 
 Ondřej Surý
 technický ředitel/Chief Technical Officer
 -----------------------------------------
 CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.  --  .cz domain registry
 Lužná 591, 160 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic
 mailto:ondrej.sury at nic.cz  http://nic.cz/
 tel:+420 222 745 110 fax:+420 220 121 184
 -----------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5888 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/attachments/20060323/a7113c76/attachment.bin>