[Collisions] "controlled interruption" - 127/8 versus RFC1918 space
jabley at hopcount.ca
Fri Jan 10 16:59:22 UTC 2014
On 2014-01-10, at 11:37, Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:
> Yes -- that's true -- leaked requests will contain some sensitive data
> -- which is why I think placing that information in the hands of
> someone "trustworthy" is better than letting it go to whoever
> registers secret-server.example
What about the network path between an internal corporate server and the trustworthy sink?
Post-Snowdonia, it seems to me that any plan that involves unexpected external network traffic needs to be carefully scrutinised.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Collisions