[as112-ops] new prefix for AS112? (2a0b:4e04:6666::/48 in RIPE with various origins it should not have)
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at massar.ch
Wed Oct 16 06:40:59 UTC 2024
Seems somebody has accidentally added it in multiple places with a variety of origin ASNs:
{ "asn": 42, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:6666::/48", "minLength": 48, "maxLength": 48, "ta": "irr", "expires": 1730268001 },
{ "asn": 112, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:6666::/48", "minLength": 48, "maxLength": 48, "ta": "irr", "expires": 1730268001 },
{ "asn": 3856, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:6666::/48", "minLength": 48, "maxLength": 48, "ta": "irr", "expires": 1730268001 },
{ "asn": 8674, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:6666::/48", "minLength": 48, "maxLength": 48, "ta": "irr", "expires": 1730268001 },
{ "asn": 13335, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:6666::/48", "minLength": 48, "maxLength": 48, "ta": "irr", "expires": 1730268001 },
{ "asn": 15133, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:6666::/48", "minLength": 48, "maxLength": 48, "ta": "irr", "expires": 1730268001 },
{ "asn": 29169, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:6666::/48", "minLength": 48, "maxLength": 48, "ta": "irr", "expires": 1730268001 },
{ "asn": 199524, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:6666::/48", "minLength": 48, "maxLength": 48, "ta": "irr", "expires": 1730268001 },
Fortunately, RPKI is getting closer and closer and we'll be able to abolish the RIR filters at one point.
Though rpki client does have these entries:
{ "asn": 215751, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04::/48", "maxLength": 48, "ta": "ripe", "expires": 1729119651 },
{ "asn": 215751, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:42::/48", "maxLength": 48, "ta": "ripe", "expires": 1729119651 },
{ "asn": 215751, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:3333::/48", "maxLength": 48, "ta": "ripe", "expires": 1729119651 },
{ "asn": 215751, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:b00b::/48", "maxLength": 48, "ta": "ripe", "expires": 1729119651 },
{ "asn": 215751, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:beef::/48", "maxLength": 48, "ta": "ripe", "expires": 1729119651 },
{ "asn": 215751, "prefix": "2a0b:4e04:f00d::/48", "maxLength": 48, "ta": "ripe", "expires": 1729119651 },
The actual 2a0b:4e04::/32 that it is all part of is nowhere to be found. The note about avoiding de-aggregation does not get far unfortunately.
Seems there is some doc here: https://fedorov.net/as215751/ thus CC'd in this thread so that they can quickly clean this all up.
Regards,
Jeroen
> On 15 Oct 2024, at 23:51, Marco d'Itri <md at Linux.IT> wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, Pim van Pelt via as112-ops <as112-ops at dns-oarc.net> wrote:
>
>> route6: 2a0b:4e04:6666::/48
>> origin: AS112
>> mnt-by: NETZR-MNT
> A decade ago the authorization rules for route objects were relaxed to
> not require anymore authorization by the aut-num object maintainer.
>
> Hence any random idiot with control over an inetnum object can create
> a corresponding route/route6 object referencing any ASN they want:
>
> https://www.ripe.net/media/documents/Route-Object-Creation-Flowchart.pdf
>
> Netnod has control over the AS112 aut-num object, so they can just
> delete this route6 object if they do not like it:
>
> https://docs.db.ripe.net/Authorisation/Protection-of-Route-Object-Space/#force-deleting-blocking-route-objects
>
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
> _______________________________________________
> as112-ops mailing list
> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops
> as112.net administrative requests
> ops at as112.net
More information about the as112-ops
mailing list