[as112-ops] New AS112 node (sort of)

[Stephen Fulton]

Funny, they accepted my LOA (via the Toronto Internet Exchange 
letterhead) but we're still not listed on the AS112 ops-listing page. 
<nudge to whomever does that>

-- 
Stephen Fulton
Toronto Internet Exchange, Operations Group
http://torix.ca

On 2018-07-30 11:23 AM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Salut Joe,
>
> By pointing the page ops-listsing.html, cogent accepted the prefixes
> without LOA. The announcement is redistributed since a couple of
> minutes.
>
> Thanks for your help, though :)
>
> Alarig Le Lay
>
> On lun. 30 juil. 10:40:37 2018, Joe Abley wrote:
>> Salut Alarig,
>>
>> If you need introductions to the more senior people at Cogent who understand what AS112 is, I might know some (some of them were around and involved when the project started).
>>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2018, at 07:40, Alarig Le Lay <alarig at swordarmor.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> They didn’t do that for the previous prefixes, but it seems that it’s
>>> now in the process
>>>
>>>     The following blocks are registered to a different company, and
>>> we do not see them announced globally from your ASN. When neither of
>>> these criteria are met, we require an LOA from the owner of the block
>>> authorizing your company to announce their IP space. You can submit the
>>> LOA by email as a signed PDF to eu-support at cogentco.com, or by fax to
>>> +49 69 2998 9666.
>>>
>>> And AS112 is listed in AS-GRIFON
>>>
>>> Also, grifon is not currently listed in https://www.as112.net/ops-listing.html
>>> Perhaps it could help to tell to cogent that I’m legitimate?
>>>
>>>
>>>> On lun. 30 juil. 12:33:19 2018, Ben Cox wrote:
>>>> For what it's worth I've got two AS112 nodes on cogent working fine, they
>>>> loaded it from the AS-SET
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, 10:32 Alarig Le Lay, <alarig at swordarmor.fr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>> On mer.  7 févr. 15:14:57 2018, Stephen Fulton wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks.  I put together an LOA under my TorIX hat and referenced the
>>>>>> RFC's.  Once of our transit's upstreams has accepted it and the other's
>>>>>> having balked so far, so it doesn't seem to be a big deal.  If I run
>>>>>> into problems, I'll document those in this thread for posterity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> One of my transit providers (cogent) requires a LOA too. I attempted to
>>>>> explain them that AS112 is anycasted but they insist.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please share the LOA you sent?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alarig Le Lay
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> as112-ops mailing list
>>>>> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
>>>>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops
>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> as112-ops mailing list
>>> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
>>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops
> _______________________________________________
> as112-ops mailing list
> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/private/as112-ops/attachments/20180730/a751224a/attachment.html>