[as112-ops] [gii-ops] Advice requested on a proposal to delegate .local to AS112

[William Sotomayor]

On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Joe Abley wrote:

> On 21 April 2016 at 20:24:10, William Sotomayor (wfms at ottix.net) wrote:
> 
> >*) How well deployed is RFC7535 (and the corresponding implementation 
> >guidance in RFC7534)? 
> 
> I've not yet done a table survey to see how well RFC7534, but it's close 
> to time to get doing it. But last I saw, it wasn't well deployed. 
> 
> How did you measure it?

Good timing!

I'm in the porocess of doing a table survey now, although I need to find a 
more diverse - and functional - set of looking glasses I can interrogate 
automatically.

I also just finished a separate survey of open resolvers to find out where 
the AS112 nodes are, although it's not completely scientific.

I think at some point, using RIPE Atlas might be the best bet and using 
the milions of credits I seem to have accumulated might be a good use of 
them.  But other things press....

> When you say it's not well-deployed, are you talking about the number of nodes supporting
> blackhole.as112.arpa, or the number of nodes supporting v6 transport for prisoner, blackhole-1
> and blackhole-2, or something else?

The former, blackhole.as112.arpa.  But as I said, need more mesaurements 
to see if the routes from the original and blackhole.as112.arpa are now 
1:1.

I had not considered IPv6 yet, but it's in the works for a table survey - 
actually I see I captured that data previously, just not looked at it. 
Good time to compare.

>       As for DNAME, I don't see much in that regard either. 
> 
> Do you mean you aren't seeing any queries for empty.as112.arpa? Or you're not aware of anybody
> having installed a DNAME to empty.as112.arpa?

The latter.

wfms