[as112-ops] [gii-ops] Advice requested on a proposal to delegate .local to AS112

[Colin Petrie]

On 21/04/16 20:50, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> In the Internet-Draft "Using DNAME in the root for the delegation of
> special-use TLDs"
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root>, there is a
> proposal to delegate heavy-use non-existing TLD like .local to the new
> AS 112. Obviously, the advice of operators of the new AS 112 is very
> important. So, please, if you approve or disapprove this idea, speak
> now.

My questions are:

*) How well deployed is RFC7535 (and the corresponding implementation
guidance in RFC7534)?

*) How do we measure its deployment? Atlas probes, open resolver scans, etc.

*) What is the criteria to declare the new AS112 worthy of having real
things delegated to it? I'm not aware of any existing delegations.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.

(And as an AS112 w/RFC7535 operator, we don't get delegated DNS traffic
to the new prefixes, last time I looked (a few months ago))

Cheers,
Colin

-- 
Colin Petrie
Systems Engineer
RIPE NCC