[as112-ops] Important ops message for all AS112 operators

[William F. Maton Sotomayor]

On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina Cazenave wrote:

> On 18/03/15 14:09, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>> some active measurement from e.g. RIPE atlas would probably also be a
>> sensible idea.
>
> Actually, as part of an unrelated exercise we scheduled measurement
> #1896798 [1] two days ago.

Very cool.

> We are currently analysing the results and we were also considering
> extending the experiment to the new IPv6 counterparts.

In a forth-coming presentation, I'll be sharing my results from querying 
about 7 million open resolvers, which yielded some more AS112 node 
hideouts.  Most interesting result:  There's a node in New Caledonia. 
Good on them for the record is to be believed!

> Since there is an apparent interest in also measuring the reachability
> of 192.31.196.1, we'll put some though into that as well.

I started announcing from OttIX, and already hit some martian filters very 
close by.  I've not been as thorough with the IPv6 counterpart but suspect 
that's making it through.

> FWIW the initial analysis of measurement #1896798 shows 101 and 148
> distinct nsid and hostname.bind values respectively.

nsid, yeah that reminds me....

> We're not such a small group of operators after all :-)

The more the merrier! :-)

wfms