From jonathan.stewart at gmail.com  Mon Mar 17 22:16:11 2014
From: jonathan.stewart at gmail.com (Jonathan Stewart)
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:16:11 -0500
Subject: [as112-ops] AS112 IPv6 trials
Message-ID: <CA+K1SUx5qmNPqLiAM_u0Js5Z2HEFirdfAY5UJbQJcpiKm+tpcQ@mail.gmail.com>

https://www.as112.net/ipv6-trials.html

Hi list,

Is there any way to participate in the IPv6 trails as outlined here?

https://www.as112.net/ipv6-trials.html

If there's no delegations to blackhole-3 and 4, then no traffic will arrive
on a configured IPv6 interface, right?

I'm speaking on behalf of the AS112 node at MBIX in Winnipeg, Canada.

If there's a cool way for us to participate, we'd be interested in trying
it out.

Thanks,

-- 
     Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/as112-ops/attachments/20140317/a0211248/attachment.htm>

From asjl at lpnz.org  Tue Mar 18 04:33:19 2014
From: asjl at lpnz.org (Andy Linton)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:33:19 +1300
Subject: [as112-ops] AS112 IPv6 trials
In-Reply-To: <CA+K1SUx5qmNPqLiAM_u0Js5Z2HEFirdfAY5UJbQJcpiKm+tpcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+K1SUx5qmNPqLiAM_u0Js5Z2HEFirdfAY5UJbQJcpiKm+tpcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALS-_OqFYy6G++JgOnTMJfwi83Bmt=F-xj=ry_YfyHw4hSGp6Q@mail.gmail.com>

My hand is up as well.


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Stewart <
jonathan.stewart at gmail.com> wrote:

> https://www.as112.net/ipv6-trials.html
>
> Hi list,
>
> Is there any way to participate in the IPv6 trails as outlined here?
>
> https://www.as112.net/ipv6-trials.html
>
> If there's no delegations to blackhole-3 and 4, then no traffic will
> arrive on a configured IPv6 interface, right?
>
> I'm speaking on behalf of the AS112 node at MBIX in Winnipeg, Canada.
>
> If there's a cool way for us to participate, we'd be interested in trying
> it out.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>      Jonathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> as112-ops mailing list
> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/as112-ops/attachments/20140318/62746e41/attachment.htm>

From ebotas at criticalcolocation.com  Tue Mar 18 13:51:35 2014
From: ebotas at criticalcolocation.com (Erwin Botas)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:51:35 -0600
Subject: [as112-ops] AS112 IPv6 trials
In-Reply-To: <CALS-_OqFYy6G++JgOnTMJfwi83Bmt=F-xj=ry_YfyHw4hSGp6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+K1SUx5qmNPqLiAM_u0Js5Z2HEFirdfAY5UJbQJcpiKm+tpcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALS-_OqFYy6G++JgOnTMJfwi83Bmt=F-xj=ry_YfyHw4hSGp6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <B12080F8-2B2C-4CF5-BDE6-AF6F37124FBA@criticalcolocation.com>

Same Here


On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz.org> wrote:

> My hand is up as well.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Stewart <jonathan.stewart at gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.as112.net/ipv6-trials.html
> 
> Hi list,
> 
> Is there any way to participate in the IPv6 trails as outlined here?
> 
> https://www.as112.net/ipv6-trials.html
> 
> If there's no delegations to blackhole-3 and 4, then no traffic will arrive on a configured IPv6 interface, right?
> 
> I'm speaking on behalf of the AS112 node at MBIX in Winnipeg, Canada.
> 
> If there's a cool way for us to participate, we'd be interested in trying it out.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
>      Jonathan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> as112-ops mailing list
> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> as112-ops mailing list
> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops


Erwin Botas
Gerente tecnolog?as de informaci?n
Tel.: +506 2010-5050   Cel.: +506 8982-4885   Fax.: +506 2223-7055
San Jos?,  Costa Rica   www.criticalcolocation.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: "La informacion contenida en este mensaje y sus adjuntos es estrictamente confidencial y se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Si usted no es el destinatario 
indicado, cualquier divulgacion, copia, distribucion o uso del contenido de este documento es prohibido y sera sancionado de acuerdo con la ley. Si recibio este mensaje por error, debe 
notificarlo de inmediato al remitente y destruirlo."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/as112-ops/attachments/20140318/f0e3a418/attachment.htm>

From jabley at hopcount.ca  Tue Mar 18 14:00:38 2014
From: jabley at hopcount.ca (Joe Abley)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:00:38 -0400
Subject: [as112-ops] AS112 IPv6 trials
In-Reply-To: <CALS-_OqFYy6G++JgOnTMJfwi83Bmt=F-xj=ry_YfyHw4hSGp6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+K1SUx5qmNPqLiAM_u0Js5Z2HEFirdfAY5UJbQJcpiKm+tpcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALS-_OqFYy6G++JgOnTMJfwi83Bmt=F-xj=ry_YfyHw4hSGp6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <94C3A2A2-B70C-4B9B-A12E-F6C4FF1E4B3A@hopcount.ca>


On 18 Mar 2014, at 0:33, Andy Linton <asjl at lpnz.org> wrote:

> My hand is up as well.

We are waiting for the working group last call of two documents:

  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-02
  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jabley-dnsop-rfc6304bis-00

While it's early to predict success (and the attendant IANA actions) the mood of dnsop at least seems to be to use this mechanism to provide v6 transport for new AS112-like names (including those under ip6.arpa), and ultimately to transition the existing zones delegated to prisoner and friends to DNAME redirection.

I think this is a better solution than trying to duct-tape v6 transport onto the existing delegations.

If you (collectively) have opinions about this, it would be great to hear them on the dnsop mailing list.


Joe


