[as112-ops] AS112 nameservers as NS for parked domains

[Warren Kumari]

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:45 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor
<wmaton at ottix.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Aleksi Suhonen wrote:
>
>> The biggest reason I haven't wanted to announce the route to our transit's
>> transits is that I fear I might be dragging some Australian, Peruvian, South
>> African and Swiss traffic to Finland and I'm not sure if that's better than
>> the status quo. If I knew that we would only catch tier1 traffic from near
>> by, I might go ahead and do it.
>
>
> Admittedly this is a concern for more than a few people.  Still, I've been
> compiling quite a bit of data using open resolvers to try and glean where
> AS112 nodes are located (as opposed to the list found on the website).
> results are interesting.  Ultimately I'd like to visualise that as compared
> to this:
>
>         http://www.wfms.org/map.html
>
> (Once I can figure out how I can get this to work under SSL it will move).

I hadn't seen that -- 'tis very cool...

W


>
> Ideally, more AS112 nodes in South America and Africa would be helpful,
> especially so at any IXP's there.  I thought I saw a similar map of IXPs -
> would be nice to compare that with the above and the data results.
>
> wfms
>
> _______________________________________________
> as112-ops mailing list
> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf