[as112-ops] AS112 nameservers as NS for parked domains

[Aleksi Suhonen]

Hello,

On 12/02/2014 01:53 AM, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
>> I think one goal should be to get AS112 nodes peered with tier1 operators
>> too, thus abolishing the need for transit... ;-)

> Now that would be clever. ;-)  But it also makes me think i could announce
> our AS112 node to our transit providers--currently we're announcing only to
> the IX.

To be honest, we also already announce it to our transit, but tagged 
with communities that limit its global visibility. If there's ever any 
problem due to that, we'll just limit it further.

If you are going to announce it to your transits, I'd like to hear about 
the developments. We might be interested in sharing the global load as well.

The biggest reason I haven't wanted to announce the route to our 
transit's transits is that I fear I might be dragging some Australian, 
Peruvian, South African and Swiss traffic to Finland and I'm not sure if 
that's better than the status quo. If I knew that we would only catch 
tier1 traffic from near by, I might go ahead and do it.

Cheers,

-- 
	+358 44 9756548 / http://www.trex.fi/
	Aleksi Suhonen / TREX Regional Exchanges Oy

	You say "potato", I say "closest-exit."