[as112-ops] AS112 nameservers as NS for parked domains

[Warren Kumari]

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:04 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor
<wmaton at ottix.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>         I recall seeing a posting either here in this list or in another
> list about someone registering or parking a domain by using the AS112
> anycast addresses as their nameservers.
>
>         Can anyone think of reasons why this is or isn't a good idea both
> from the perspective of the domain name operator and the AS112 operator?

>From the AS112 ops perspective -- simply a bit more traffic, that the
AS112 operator might not have been expecting.
Not saying one or two folk, but if this became *really* common. Not a
good or bad idea, just something to keep in mind for scaling...

"Can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day walking
in, changing their NS to be AS112 and walking out. And friends they
may thinks it's a movement."
W
P.S: *This* is why I shouldn't send mail while listening to music...




>
> wfms
> _______________________________________________
> as112-ops mailing list
> as112-ops at lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/as112-ops



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf